Samsung does something similar with, I think they still make it that DeX. Like the apps don’t change and the things don’t change but it looks more like a desktop. I want, so we’ve talked about this for a while with the iPad, I want like a whatever you want to call it a desktop mode where when you pop that thing onto a Magic Keyboard or a stand or whatever you want to call it, it gives you a more of a desktop-like environment. Mine’s slightly more realistic but still probably likely not to happen. RL: Mike, do you have something on your, wish list? It is at the very edge of what you can literally put on a silicon wafer and get a functioning chip that doesn’t have too many flaws to be usable.
#Mac aloof mac#
That would be a way for them to get around the problem of the current Mac Studios chip is ginormous. I think they see a lot of benefits to it all being integrated into one thing. Then another chip is that your GPU with its own bank of memory and stuff. Instead of it all being one as the SoC, you’d have one chip that is your CPU and maybe machine learning stuff is on that die as well. JC: I always thought it would be very, very interesting if Apple took the main architecture that it has CPU architecture, its GPU architecture, and made separate chips for the Mac Pro. I don’t think it will really happen, but hey, why not? I mean, it does seem like an impossible task, but hey, Apple, you can figure it out.
#Mac aloof Pc#
And to put it in an Apple marketing sense, it’s not truly user-upgradable in terms of what the PC people are always wanting. RL: It would be a modernization of that upgradable idea, I guess. You were the company that was all about…when IBM was all locked down. It’s like, hey, remember your roots, Apple. It’s a good wish though for the wish list.
#Mac aloof pro#
But that kind of stuff is going to be what makes it pro over the Mac Studio. And it’s just going to be more performance than Mac Studio, more I/O, more like Thunderbolt ports, SD card slot, all that other kind of stuff, more external expansion, maybe HDMI 2.1, I don’t know. But it comes at the compromise of plugging in stuff inside your computer’s gone on the inside.
I worry that this transition to Apple silicon has had so many benefits in terms of performance at a certain amount of power use. So I would be worried that even storage will not be upgradeable. It’s going to be like IOPS per second of things this size. And it’s not just like how fast is the transfer speed. So just popping in any old M.2 drive, you could really host your system performance if it doesn’t meet certain performance characteristics in certain ways. I don’t want to go storage as RAM, but the way they swap storage and move stuff in storage with this really, really fast storage and a big storage cache, they need to make sure that the storage performs a certain way.
#Mac aloof upgrade#
Yeah, I think this move to the Apple silicon means no upgrade for that and probably no upgrade for storage because…they also rely on storage. It’s on the card, and that’s how much graphics RAM you have. They don’t have that problem with the Intel ones because all the graphics stuff is a plug-in card that has its own RAM that is not upgradeable. It’s going to be a real compromise over what they do now with the SoC. To go through a memory bus to a plug-in piece of RAM, it’s not impossible to have a wide memory bus, but they’re just not going to get the performance that they get. But the way the system on chips work is part of the whole reason they can be as performant as they are, especially with the graphics on the Mac Studio and everything, is that they have a really wide memory bus to chips that are physically located right around the SoC with very short traces, a very wide bus soldered onto the motherboard.
0 kommentar(er)
